build_index_maps, build_index_maps_from_files, and (mostly) build_process_map_from_files had no test pinning their sort order, tie-breaking, or cross-file union behavior — all load-bearing for a trained checkpoint's vocabulary, and all at risk of silently changing under a future single-pass (pyarrow/polars) rewrite of the setup-stage scan. Add tests for numeric-vs-lexicographic PDG sort (nuclear/ion codes), negative PDG codes, dedup/bijective indices, file-order independence, and process-map tie-breaking/boundary conditions (n_experts=1, fewer processes than experts, 3-file partial overlap). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
giant
Geant4 Inference via Autoregressive Neural sTep surrogate — a play on Geant4 and the step function being the computationally heaviest part of the simulation.
Proof-of-concept surrogate model for the Geant4 step function. Given a pre-step particle state, the model samples a physically plausible post-step outcome — the primary's continuation plus the secondary particles it produces — replacing the stochastic Geant4 physics engine with a trained conditional generative model.
Training is driven entirely from parquet files of the miniCaloSim steps tree. No Geant4 runtime dependency.
Architecture
A two-stage conditional flow matching model (Lipman et al. 2022): a small MLP learns a vector field mapping noise → step outcomes in ~10 ODE steps per sample. Falls back to DDPM for comparison.
Stage 1 — primary (9D, diffused):
| Index | Variable | Encoding |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | step_length [mm] |
log |
| 1–2 | edep_logit, sec_logit |
ALR coords of the deposit/secondary/post-energy simplex |
| 3–5 | post_dir in local frame |
unit vector |
| 6–8 | travel_dir (post_pos − pre_pos) in local frame |
unit vector |
The two energy logits decode via softmax over [edep_logit, sec_logit, 0] × pre_E, so edep + e_sec + post_E == pre_E exactly — energy conservation is built into the parametrization, not left to the loss. Stage 1 also has a classifier head predicting the number of secondaries n_sec ∈ {0..15} from the conditioning alone.
Both post_dir and travel_dir are expressed in the coordinate frame where pre_dir = ẑ, making the scattering distribution nearly azimuthally symmetric. post_pos itself is not a raw target — it's reconstructed at inference as pre_pos + step_length * world_frame(travel_dir), so the two stay consistent by construction instead of being learned (and potentially diverging) independently.
Stage 2 — secondaries (SecondaryDecoder): conditioned on the pre-step state and the Stage-1 outcome, a second flow net generates all K_MAX = 15 secondary slots at once. Each slot carries a stick-breaking energy fraction, a local-frame direction, and a continuous particle-type embedding (snapped to the nearest PDG at inference), ordered by descending energy; slots beyond the predicted n_sec are masked. The secondary energies are a stick-breaking partition of the e_sec budget from Stage 1, so the full chain conserves energy. Each secondary's momentum is reconstructed afterward from (energy, direction, species) rather than predicted.
Conditioning: PDG code (embedding), pre-step position, log(pre-energy), pre-step direction, material (embedding), layer ID. (n_sec / e_sec are outputs now, not inputs.)
Roadmap
Phase 1 (done): n_sec and total secondary energy e_sec were conditioning inputs; the model predicted only the 9D primary post-step (energy-conservation PoC).
Phase 2 (implemented — baseline): the two-stage model above predicts n_sec and each secondary's energy, direction, and species jointly with the primary, so a shower rollout is fully self-contained.
Next directions: faster-eval architectures against a ~10× native-Geant4 budget (Wasserstein-GAN, mixture-of-experts routing tree), a multi-material sampling-calorimeter dataset, and physical-property conditioning over learned embeddings.
Data
Input: parquet files produced by miniCaloSim, or converted from a ROOT file via uv run dwarf convert. Each row is one Geant4 step. Train/val split is by event_id (not row shuffle) to avoid leaking correlated steps from the same shower.
Project structure
giant/
├── giant/
│ ├── data/
│ │ ├── loader.py # parquet → numpy arrays (incl. streaming/chunked reads)
│ │ ├── transforms.py # log transforms, local-frame rotation, energy simplex, secondary encode/decode
│ │ └── dataset.py # StepsDataset / StreamingStepsDataset (PyTorch)
│ ├── model/
│ │ ├── network.py # SinusoidalEmbedding, ConditionEncoder, DenoisingMLP, SecondaryDecoder
│ │ └── schedule.py # CosineSchedule (DDPM) and flow matching utilities
│ ├── constants.py # output/conditioning dims, K_MAX, secondary slot layout, schema keys
│ ├── config.py # default hyperparameters, TOML config merging, device autodetect
│ ├── pipeline.py # builds datasets/normalizers and kicks off a training run
│ ├── train.py # two-stage training loop, checkpointing, graceful shutdown
│ ├── sample.py # DDPM / DDIM / flow matching samplers + secondary sampling
│ ├── geometry.py # GeometryOracle: position → (material, layer_id, escaped) for rollout
│ ├── rollout.py # autoregressive shower rollout driver
│ ├── validate.py # step-level marginal + KL-divergence validation
│ ├── analysis.py # step- and shower-level diagnostics: marginals, correlations, rollout observables
│ └── cli.py # `giant train` / `predict` / `rollout` Typer app
├── scripts/ # dataset/tooling logic, unified under the `dwarf` CLI (`uv run dwarf --help`)
│ ├── dwarf.py # Typer app: convert, migrate, bump-gen, bump-schema, status,
│ │ # update-manifest, create-manifest, make-root, hparam-scan
│ ├── steps_to_parquet.py # ROOT → parquet conversion (uproot/awkward/polars) — `dwarf convert`
│ ├── steps_to_parquet_parallel.py # fan out conversion over several ROOT files — `dwarf convert --jobs N`
│ ├── migrate_geant_steps.py # one-time move into the raw/processed/pools/derived layout — `dwarf migrate`
│ ├── bump_dataset_version.py # cut a new raw gen or parquet schema, with a logged reason —
│ │ # `dwarf bump-gen` / `bump-schema` / `status` / `update-manifest` / `create-manifest`
│ ├── create_root_files.py # generate new ROOT shards via a minicalosim executable — `dwarf make-root`
│ ├── geometry_oracle.py # fit a position → (material, layer_id) oracle — `dwarf build-geometry-oracle`
│ └── hparam_scan.py # hyperparameter grid scan over `giant train` runs — `dwarf hparam-scan`
└── tests/
Setup
uv sync --extra cpu # CPU-only torch (use --extra cuda for CUDA 11.8 instead)
uv sync --extra cpu --extra dev # add dev tools (pytest, ruff, ty)
cpu and cuda are mutually exclusive extras selecting the torch build; plain uv sync installs no torch at all. See CLAUDE.md for details.
Training, prediction, and rollout
giant train path/to/steps.parquet --mode flow
giant predict path/to/steps.parquet --checkpoint checkpoints/.../best.pt
# Full-shower rollout needs a geometry oracle (position → material/layer_id):
uv sync --extra cpu --extra geometry
dwarf build-geometry-oracle path/to/steps.parquet --out oracle.pkl
giant rollout path/to/steps.parquet --checkpoint checkpoints/.../best.pt --geometry oracle.pkl
train/predict accept a TOML config file (--config) and CLI overrides for hyperparameters; see --help on any command for the full option list. giant train --wandb logs per-epoch metrics (the same ones written to metrics.csv) to Weights & Biases; requires uv sync --extra wandb. giant rollout seeds showers from the highest-energy entry step per event, then autoregressively steps the two-stage model to completion — pushing secondaries as new tracks and looking up material/layer_id from the oracle at each step. Tracks terminate on energy cutoff, per-track max steps, detector escape, or natural end; energy is deposited locally on every stop except escape (leakage), so showers conserve energy by construction.
Validation
giant.validate.validate_marginals runs step-level marginal and KL-divergence checks during training (--validate-every). For deeper diagnostics on a trained checkpoint — stratified marginals, correlation structure, physical-constraint violations, and shower-level rollout observables (longitudinal/transverse profiles, PDG energy shares) — see giant.analysis.
Development
uv run pytest # run tests
uv run ruff check . # lint
uv run ruff format . # format
uv run ty check . # type check