Files
giant/CLAUDE.md
T
lars af8dce53a7 Update CLAUDE.md and README for the implemented Phase 2 model
Bring the docs in line with the current two-stage code: energy ALR
simplex output, 8D conditioning (n_sec/e_sec now predicted, not given),
the SecondaryDecoder stage, and the shower rollout + geometry oracle.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 13:42:53 +02:00

64 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# CLAUDE.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
## Commands
```bash
uv sync --extra cpu # install dependencies with CPU-only torch (standard/default)
uv sync --extra cuda # install dependencies with CUDA 11.8 torch
uv sync --extra cpu --extra dev # add dev extras (pytest, etc.)
uv sync --extra cpu --extra geometry # add scikit-learn for the geometry oracle (giant rollout)
pytest # run tests
giant train path/to/steps.parquet --mode flow # train (flow matching)
giant train path/to/steps.parquet --mode ddpm # train (DDPM baseline)
giant predict path/to/steps.parquet --checkpoint ckpt/best.pt # per-step predictions
giant rollout path/to/steps.parquet --checkpoint ckpt/best.pt --geometry oracle.pkl # full showers
dwarf --help # dataset/tooling CLI: convert, migrate, bump-gen,
# bump-schema, status, update-manifest, create-manifest,
# make-root, build-geometry-oracle, hparam-scan
# (see scripts/dwarf.py)
```
`cpu` and `cuda` are mutually exclusive — pick one to select the torch build (pinned to 2.3.x; newer torch requires newer NVIDIA drivers). Plain `uv sync` with no extra will not install torch at all; uv has no concept of a "default extra", so `--extra cpu` should always be included unless you need GPU support.
### Lint and type checking
```bash
uv run ruff check . # lint
uv run ruff format . # format
uv run ty check . # type check
```
Part of the `dev` extra. Run these periodically (not just at commit time) to catch drift early.
## Architecture
GIANT is a conditional generative surrogate for the Geant4 step function. It replaces the stochastic physics engine: given a pre-step particle state (conditioning), it samples a post-step outcome — now including the variable-length list of secondary particles the step produces (Phase 2, see Roadmap).
**Data pipeline** (`giant/data/`): parquet files from miniCaloSim are loaded into numpy arrays (`loader.py`), then log-transformed and rotated into a local coordinate frame where `pre_dir = ẑ` (`transforms.py`), before being wrapped in a PyTorch `Dataset` (`dataset.py`). Train/val split is by `event_id` to avoid leaking correlated steps from the same shower.
**Stage-1 output space (9D, `giant/constants.py:LOCAL_TARGET_NAMES`):** `log_step_length`, two additive-log-ratio (ALR) coordinates `edep_logit`/`sec_logit` of a **deposit / secondary / post-energy simplex**, `post_dir` (post-scattering momentum direction, unit vector in the local frame), and `travel_dir` (direction of `post_pos - pre_pos`, unit vector in the local frame). The energy simplex decodes via softmax over `[edep_logit, sec_logit, 0]` × `pre_E` so `edep + e_sec + post_E == pre_E` holds by construction — energy conservation is architectural, not learned (see `energy_simplex_decode`). `post_pos` is not a raw target — it's reconstructed at inference as `pre_pos + step_length * world_frame(travel_dir)`, since `step_length` already encodes that displacement's magnitude and duplicating it would let the two become inconsistent.
**Conditioning vector (8D continuous, `COND_DIM`):** pre-step position, log(pre-energy), pre-step direction, layer ID — plus PDG code and material as embeddings. `n_sec` and `e_sec` are **no longer conditioning inputs** (that was Phase 1 / the energy-conservation PoC); the model now predicts them.
**Model** (`giant/model/network.py`): a two-stage model, both checkpointed together.
- **Stage 1 — `DenoisingMLP`:** `ResBlock` stack with a `SinusoidalEmbedding` for the flow/diffusion time variable and a `ConditionEncoder` fusing the conditioning. Predicts the 9D primary vector field, plus an `n_sec_head` classifier over `{0..K_MAX}` (`K_MAX=15`) that runs on the condition encoding alone (no diffusion noise), callable via `predict_n_sec`.
- **Stage 2 — `SecondaryDecoder`:** a second flow-matching net (`SecondaryConditionEncoder` fuses the pre-step conditioning with the Stage-1 outcome) that generates all `K_MAX` secondary slots at once. Each slot is `(stick-breaking energy logit, local-frame direction 3D, continuous type embedding 16D)` = `SEC_SLOT_DIM=20`, ordered by descending energy; slots beyond the predicted `n_sec` are masked. Secondary energies are a **stick-breaking partition of the `e_sec` budget** from Stage 1 (they sum to it), so the whole chain conserves energy. The type embedding is trained against a detached PDG-embedding target (stops self-referential collapse) and snapped to the nearest PDG at inference (`snap_type_to_pdg_idx`).
`schedule.py` provides both a `CosineSchedule` for DDPM and the flow matching loss utilities (Lipman et al. 2022 conditional flow matching).
**Samplers** (`giant/sample.py`): DDPM, DDIM, and flow matching (ODE integration, ~10 steps). Flow matching is the primary mode.
**Validation** (`giant/validate.py`): step-level marginal comparisons. Shower-level (rollout) observables live in `giant/analysis.py` (`compute_rollout_observables` + `plot_rollout_*`), fed by `giant rollout` output.
**Shower rollout** (`giant/rollout.py`, `giant rollout` CLI): autoregressively steps the two-stage model into a full shower — each primary post-step becomes the next pre-step, secondaries are pushed as new tracks, and per-step `material`/`layer_id` come from a `GeometryOracle` (`giant/geometry.py`, built via `dwarf build-geometry-oracle`) that learns position → (material, layer_id) from data and flags detector escape by nearest-neighbour distance. Tracks terminate on energy cutoff, per-track max steps, escape, or natural end; energy is deposited locally on every stop except escape (leakage), so showers conserve energy by construction.
## Roadmap
**Phase 1 (done):** number of secondaries and their total energy were conditioning inputs; the model predicted only the 9D primary post-step (energy-conservation PoC).
**Phase 2 (implemented — baseline):** the two-stage model above jointly predicts `n_sec`, the energy simplex (`e_sec` falls out of it), and each secondary's energy/direction/species, so a rollout is self-contained (no ground-truth secondary counts injected). This is the "get a baseline out" track agreed with Jan & Tobias (2026-07-07).
**Next directions** (parallel, not yet built): faster-eval architectures measured against a ~10× native-Geant4 budget — a Wasserstein-GAN throwaway (single-pass eval) and a mixture-of-experts / routing tree of small nets selected per call (pdg / energy / process), with soft/differentiable gating on continuous routing axes; a sampling-calorimeter (multi-material) dataset; and preferring **material + particle physical properties** over learned embeddings for conditioning. See the knowledge base (`/home/lars/knowledge-base/meta/roadmap.md`).