Condition on material + particle physical properties, not learned embeddings #7
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Condition the surrogate on material and particle physical properties rather than learned embeddings of material name / PDG code.
Why: physical-property conditioning is the path to generalising across materials/particles instead of memorising the training menu (currently 2 materials, ~192 PDG codes). It also gives the MoE router meaningful continuous conditioning axes, and continues the "more physics into the net" theme. Related hypothesis (Jan, 2026-06-25): the peaked photon
edepdistribution may be a material-property effect that simplifies once the relevant properties are fed in. Worth comparing generalisation on a held-out material against the embedding baseline.Source: Jan & Tobias meeting 2026-07-07 §6 (also the
minicalosim-geometryopen question).created branch
7-condition-on-material-particle-physical-properties-not-learned-embeddingsto address this issuementioned in merge request !5
mentioned in commit
4d190696fe