lars/geant4
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Import Geant4 9.3.0 source tree

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Gabriele Cosmo
2016-06-09 16:15:05 +02:00
parent b79225fb37
commit 74cad5e589
3877 changed files with 234205 additions and 167127 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
source/processes/electromagnetic/adjoint/include/G4AdjointPhotoElectricModel.hh
+27 -4
View File
@@ -23,18 +23,31 @@
// * acceptance of all terms of the Geant4 Software license. *
// ********************************************************************
//
// $Id: G4AdjointPhotoElectricModel.hh,v 1.4 2009/11/20 10:31:20 ldesorgh Exp $
// GEANT4 tag $Name: geant4-09-03 $
//
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Module: G4AdjointPhotoElectricModel.hh
// Module: G4AdjointPhotoElectricModel
// Author: L. Desorgher
// Date: 10 October 2007
// Organisation: SpaceIT GmbH
// Contract: ESA contract 21435/08/NL/AT
// Customer: ESA/ESTEC
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// CHANGE HISTORY
// --------------
// ChangeHistory:
// 1 September 2007 creation by L. Desorgher
// -1 September 2007 creation by L. Desorgher
//
// -January 2009. L. Desorgher
// Put a higher limit on the CS to avoid a high rate of Inverse Photo e- effect at low energy. The very high adjoint CS of the reverse
// photo electric reaction produce a high rate of reverse photo electric reaction in the inner side of a shielding for eaxmple, the correction of this occurence
// by weight correction in the StepDoIt method is not statistically sufficient at small energy. The problem is partially solved by setting an higher CS limit
// and compensating it by an extra weight correction factor. However when coupling it with other reverse processes the reverse photo-electric is still
// the source of very occasional high weight that decrease the efficiency of the computation. A way to solve this problemn is still needed but is difficult
// to find as it happens in rarea case but does give a weighrt that is outside the noemal distribution. (Very Tricky!)
//
// -October 2009 Correction of Element sampling. L. Desorgher
//
//-------------------------------------------------------------
// Documentation:
@@ -60,7 +73,6 @@ public:
virtual void SampleSecondaries(const G4Track& aTrack,
G4bool IsScatProjToProjCase,
G4ParticleChange* fParticleChange);
virtual G4double AdjointCrossSection(const G4MaterialCutsCouple* aCouple,
G4double primEnergy,
G4bool IsScatProjToProjCase);
@@ -72,11 +84,22 @@ public:
inline void SetTheDirectPEEffectModel(G4PEEffectModel* aModel){theDirectPEEffectModel = aModel;
DefineDirectEMModel(aModel);}
virtual void CorrectPostStepWeight(G4ParticleChange* fParticleChange,
G4double old_weight,
G4double adjointPrimKinEnergy,
G4double projectileKinEnergy,
G4bool IsScatProjToProjCase);
private:
G4double xsec[40];
G4double totAdjointCS;
G4double totBiasedAdjointCS;
G4double factorCSBiasing;
G4double pre_step_AdjointCS;
G4double post_step_AdjointCS;
G4double shell_prob[40][40];