Morten Hjorth-Jensen
39 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
39 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
** Template for evaluating and grading projects **
|
|
|
|
**Evaluation of project number: **
|
|
**Name: **
|
|
|
|
*Abstract: accurate and informative? Total number of possible points: 5*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Introduction: status of problem and the major objectives. Total number of possible points: 10*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Formalism/methods: Discussion of the methods used and their basis/suitability. Total number of possible points 20*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Code/Implementations/test: Readability of code, implementation, testing and discussion of benchmarks. Total number of possible points 20*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Analysis: of results and the effectiveness of their selection and presentation. Are the results well understood and discussed? Total number of possible points: 20*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Conclusions, discussions and critical comments: on what was learned about the method used and on the results obtained. Possible directions and future improvements? Total number of possible points: 10*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Clarity of figures and overall presentation. Too much or too little? Total number of possible points: 10*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Referencing: relevant works cited accurately? Total number of possible points 5*
|
|
|
|
Mark and comments:
|
|
|
|
*Overall mark (%) and final possible final comments*
|