Updated the introduction

This commit is contained in:
mhjensen
2018-05-28 17:38:49 -04:00
parent eb8d0529b0
commit 998e88b58a
19 changed files with 1347 additions and 502 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ factor in front of \( x \) and the normal distribution. Try to change the
function \( y \) to
$$
y = 10x+0.01N(0,1),
y = 10x+0.01 \times N(0,1),
$$
<p>
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ long run. Here we have only defined the training data and our model, and
have not discussed a more rigorous approach to the <b>cost</b> function.
<p>
We need more rigorous criteria in defining whether we have succeed or
We need more rigorous criteria in defining whether we have succeeded or
not in modeling our training data. You will be surprised to see that
many scientists seldomly venture beyond this 'by the eye' approach. A
standard approach for the <em>cost</em> function is the so-called \( \chi^2 \)