update on book
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
|
||||
"coefficients of a functional fit (say a polynomial) in order to be\n",
|
||||
"able to predict the response of a continuous variable on some unseen\n",
|
||||
"data. The fit to the continuous variable $y_i$ is based on some\n",
|
||||
"independent variables $\\hat{x}_i$. Linear regression resulted in\n",
|
||||
"independent variables $x_i$. Linear regression resulted in\n",
|
||||
"analytical expressions for standard ordinary Least Squares or Ridge\n",
|
||||
"regression (in terms of matrices to invert) for several quantities,\n",
|
||||
"ranging from the variance and thereby the confidence intervals of the\n",
|
||||
"parameters $\\hat{\\beta}$ to the mean squared error. If we can invert\n",
|
||||
"optimal parameters $\\hat{\\beta}$ to the mean squared error. If we can invert\n",
|
||||
"the product of the design matrices, linear regression gives then a\n",
|
||||
"simple recipe for fitting our data.\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
|
||||
"from $k=0,\\dots,K-1$ (i.e. $K$ classes).\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"The goal is to predict the\n",
|
||||
"output classes from the design matrix $\\hat{X}\\in\\mathbb{R}^{n\\times p}$\n",
|
||||
"output classes from the design matrix $\\boldsymbol{X}\\in\\mathbb{R}^{n\\times p}$\n",
|
||||
"made of $n$ samples, each of which carries $p$ features or predictors. The\n",
|
||||
"primary goal is to identify the classes to which new unseen samples\n",
|
||||
"belong.\n",
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\begin{equation}\n",
|
||||
"\\hat{y} = \\hat{X}^T\\hat{\\beta} + \\hat{\\epsilon},\n",
|
||||
"\\boldsymbol{y} = \\boldsymbol{X}^T\\boldsymbol{\\beta} + \\boldsymbol{\\epsilon},\n",
|
||||
"\\label{_auto1} \\tag{1}\n",
|
||||
"\\end{equation}\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"where $\\hat{y}$ is a vector representing the possible outcomes, $\\hat{X}$ is our\n",
|
||||
"$n\\times p$ design matrix and $\\hat{\\beta}$ represents our estimators/predictors.\n",
|
||||
"where $\\boldsymbol{y}$ is a vector representing the possible outcomes, $\\boldsymbol{X}$ is our\n",
|
||||
"$n\\times p$ design matrix and $\\boldsymbol{\\beta}$ represents our estimators/predictors.\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"The main problem with our function is that it takes values on the\n",
|
||||
@@ -380,8 +380,8 @@
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\begin{align*}\n",
|
||||
"p(y_i=1|x_i,\\hat{\\beta}) &= \\frac{\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}},\\nonumber\\\\\n",
|
||||
"p(y_i=0|x_i,\\hat{\\beta}) &= 1 - p(y_i=1|x_i,\\hat{\\beta}),\n",
|
||||
"p(y_i=1|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta}) &= \\frac{\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}},\\nonumber\\\\\n",
|
||||
"p(y_i=0|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta}) &= 1 - p(y_i=1|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta}),\n",
|
||||
"\\end{align*}\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"where $\\hat{\\beta}$ are the weights we wish to extract from data, in our case $\\beta_0$ and $\\beta_1$. \n",
|
||||
"where $\\boldsymbol{\\beta}$ are the weights we wish to extract from data, in our case $\\beta_0$ and $\\beta_1$. \n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"Note that we used"
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"p(y_i=0\\vert x_i, \\hat{\\beta}) = 1-p(y_i=1\\vert x_i, \\hat{\\beta}).\n",
|
||||
"p(y_i=0\\vert x_i, \\boldsymbol{\\beta}) = 1-p(y_i=1\\vert x_i, \\boldsymbol{\\beta}).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\begin{align*}\n",
|
||||
"P(\\mathcal{D}|\\hat{\\beta})& = \\prod_{i=1}^n \\left[p(y_i=1|x_i,\\hat{\\beta})\\right]^{y_i}\\left[1-p(y_i=1|x_i,\\hat{\\beta}))\\right]^{1-y_i}\\nonumber \\\\\n",
|
||||
"P(\\mathcal{D}|\\boldsymbol{\\beta})& = \\prod_{i=1}^n \\left[p(y_i=1|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta})\\right]^{y_i}\\left[1-p(y_i=1|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta}))\\right]^{1-y_i}\\nonumber \\\\\n",
|
||||
"\\end{align*}\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta}) = \\sum_{i=1}^n \\left( y_i\\log{p(y_i=1|x_i,\\hat{\\beta})} + (1-y_i)\\log\\left[1-p(y_i=1|x_i,\\hat{\\beta}))\\right]\\right).\n",
|
||||
"\\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta}) = \\sum_{i=1}^n \\left( y_i\\log{p(y_i=1|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta})} + (1-y_i)\\log\\left[1-p(y_i=1|x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta}))\\right]\\right).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta}) = \\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_i(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i) -\\log{(1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)})}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"\\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta}) = \\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_i(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i) -\\log{(1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)})}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta})=-\\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_i(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i) -\\log{(1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)})}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"\\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta})=-\\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_i(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i) -\\log{(1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)})}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
|
||||
"in practice we often supplement the cross-entropy with additional regularization terms, usually $L_1$ and $L_2$ regularization as we did for Ridge and Lasso regression.\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"The cross entropy is a convex function of the weights $\\hat{\\beta}$ and,\n",
|
||||
"The cross entropy is a convex function of the weights $\\boldsymbol{\\beta}$ and,\n",
|
||||
"therefore, any local minimizer is a global minimizer. \n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial \\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta})}{\\partial \\beta_0} = -\\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_i -\\frac{\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}\\right),\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial \\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta})}{\\partial \\beta_0} = -\\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_i -\\frac{\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}\\right),\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial \\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta})}{\\partial \\beta_1} = -\\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_ix_i -x_i\\frac{\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial \\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta})}{\\partial \\beta_1} = -\\sum_{i=1}^n \\left(y_ix_i -x_i\\frac{\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_i)}}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -521,9 +521,9 @@
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"Let us now define a vector $\\hat{y}$ with $n$ elements $y_i$, an\n",
|
||||
"$n\\times p$ matrix $\\hat{X}$ which contains the $x_i$ values and a\n",
|
||||
"vector $\\hat{p}$ of fitted probabilities $p(y_i\\vert x_i,\\hat{\\beta})$. We can rewrite in a more compact form the first\n",
|
||||
"Let us now define a vector $\\boldsymbol{y}$ with $n$ elements $y_i$, an\n",
|
||||
"$n\\times p$ matrix $\\boldsymbol{X}$ which contains the $x_i$ values and a\n",
|
||||
"vector $\\boldsymbol{p}$ of fitted probabilities $p(y_i\\vert x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta})$. We can rewrite in a more compact form the first\n",
|
||||
"derivative of cost function as"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial \\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta})}{\\partial \\hat{\\beta}} = -\\hat{X}^T\\left(\\hat{y}-\\hat{p}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial \\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta})}{\\partial \\boldsymbol{\\beta}} = -\\boldsymbol{X}^T\\left(\\boldsymbol{y}-\\boldsymbol{p}\\right).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -540,8 +540,8 @@
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"If we in addition define a diagonal matrix $\\hat{W}$ with elements \n",
|
||||
"$p(y_i\\vert x_i,\\hat{\\beta})(1-p(y_i\\vert x_i,\\hat{\\beta})$, we can obtain a compact expression of the second derivative as"
|
||||
"If we in addition define a diagonal matrix $\\boldsymbol{W}$ with elements \n",
|
||||
"$p(y_i\\vert x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta})(1-p(y_i\\vert x_i,\\boldsymbol{\\beta})$, we can obtain a compact expression of the second derivative as"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial^2 \\mathcal{C}(\\hat{\\beta})}{\\partial \\hat{\\beta}\\partial \\hat{\\beta}^T} = \\hat{X}^T\\hat{W}\\hat{X}.\n",
|
||||
"\\frac{\\partial^2 \\mathcal{C}(\\boldsymbol{\\beta})}{\\partial \\boldsymbol{\\beta}\\partial \\boldsymbol{\\beta}^T} = \\boldsymbol{X}^T\\boldsymbol{W}\\boldsymbol{X}.\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\log{ \\frac{p(\\hat{\\beta}\\hat{x})}{1-p(\\hat{\\beta}\\hat{x})}} = \\beta_0+\\beta_1x_1+\\beta_2x_2+\\dots+\\beta_px_p.\n",
|
||||
"\\log{ \\frac{p(\\boldsymbol{\\beta}\\boldsymbol{x})}{1-p(\\boldsymbol{\\beta}\\boldsymbol{x})}} = \\beta_0+\\beta_1x_1+\\beta_2x_2+\\dots+\\beta_px_p.\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"Here we defined $\\hat{x}=[1,x_1,x_2,\\dots,x_p]$ and $\\hat{\\beta}=[\\beta_0, \\beta_1, \\dots, \\beta_p]$ leading to"
|
||||
"Here we defined $\\boldsymbol{x}=[1,x_1,x_2,\\dots,x_p]$ and $\\boldsymbol{\\beta}=[\\beta_0, \\beta_1, \\dots, \\beta_p]$ leading to"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"p(\\hat{\\beta}\\hat{x})=\\frac{ \\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_1+\\beta_2x_2+\\dots+\\beta_px_p)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_1+\\beta_2x_2+\\dots+\\beta_px_p)}}.\n",
|
||||
"p(\\boldsymbol{\\beta}\\boldsymbol{x})=\\frac{ \\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_1+\\beta_2x_2+\\dots+\\beta_px_p)}}{1+\\exp{(\\beta_0+\\beta_1x_1+\\beta_2x_2+\\dots+\\beta_px_p)}}.\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@
|
||||
"multinomial logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis, the\n",
|
||||
"input to the function is the result of $K$ distinct linear functions,\n",
|
||||
"and the predicted probability for the $k$-th class given a sample\n",
|
||||
"vector $\\hat{x}$ and a weighting vector $\\hat{\\beta}$ is (with two\n",
|
||||
"vector $\\boldsymbol{x}$ and a weighting vector $\\boldsymbol{\\beta}$ is (with two\n",
|
||||
"predictors):"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@
|
||||
"cell_type": "markdown",
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"Defining the Jacobian matrix ${\\bf \\boldsymbol{J}}$ we have"
|
||||
"Defining the Jacobian matrix $\\boldsymbol{J}$ we have"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"{\\bf \\boldsymbol{J}}=\\left( \\begin{array}{cc}\n",
|
||||
"\\boldsymbol{J}=\\left( \\begin{array}{cc}\n",
|
||||
" \\partial f_1/\\partial x_1 & \\partial f_1/\\partial x_2 \\\\\n",
|
||||
" \\partial f_2/\\partial x_1 &\\partial f_2/\\partial x_2\n",
|
||||
" \\end{array} \\right),\n",
|
||||
@@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"$$\n",
|
||||
"\\left(\\begin{array}{c} h_1^{n} \\\\ h_2^{n} \\end{array} \\right)=\n",
|
||||
" -{\\bf \\boldsymbol{J}}^{-1}\n",
|
||||
" -\\boldsymbol{J}^{-1}\n",
|
||||
" \\left(\\begin{array}{c} f_1(x_1^{n},x_2^{n}) \\\\ f_2(x_1^{n},x_2^{n}) \\end{array} \\right).\n",
|
||||
"$$"
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"We need thus to compute the inverse of the Jacobian matrix and it\n",
|
||||
"is to understand that difficulties may\n",
|
||||
"arise in case ${\\bf \\boldsymbol{J}}$ is nearly singular.\n",
|
||||
"arise in case $\\boldsymbol{J}$ is nearly singular.\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"It is rather straightforward to extend the above scheme to systems of\n",
|
||||
"more than two non-linear equations. In our case, the Jacobian matrix is given by the Hessian that represents the second derivative of cost function. \n",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user