From 4e470829f0b4538778f26439a07921c695275677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Morten Hjorth-Jensen Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:14:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] added file on how to evaluate projects --- .../HowWeEvaluateProjects/projecteval.txt | 38 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/Projects/2018/HowWeEvaluateProjects/projecteval.txt diff --git a/doc/Projects/2018/HowWeEvaluateProjects/projecteval.txt b/doc/Projects/2018/HowWeEvaluateProjects/projecteval.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5a3e1d692 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/Projects/2018/HowWeEvaluateProjects/projecteval.txt @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +** Template for evaluating and grading projects ** + +**Evaluation of project number: ** +**Name: ** + +*Abstract: accurate and informative? Total number of possible points: 5* + +Mark and comments: + +*Introduction: status of problem and the major objectives. Total number of possible points: 10* + +Mark and comments: + +*Formalism/methods: Discussion of the methods used and their basis/suitability. Total number of possible points 20* + +Mark and comments: + +*Code/Implementations/test: Readability of code, implementation, testing and discussion of benchmarks. Total number of possible points 20* + +Mark and comments: + +*Analysis: of results and the effectiveness of their selection and presentation. Are the results well understood and discussed? Total number of possible points: 20* + +Mark and comments: + +*Conclusions, discussions and critical comments: on what was learned about the method used and on the results obtained. Possible directions and future improvements? Total number of possible points: 10* + +Mark and comments: + +*Clarity of figures and overall presentation. Too much or too little? Total number of possible points: 10* + +Mark and comments: + +*Referencing: relevant works cited accurately? Total number of possible points 5* + +Mark and comments: + +*Overall mark (%) and final possible final comments*